Home
Physics

Semiconductor Physics Series Part 5: Semiconductor in Equilibrium

In this chapter, we derived the electron and hole concentrations of intrinsic semiconductors in thermal equilibrium from the density of states and the Fermi–Dirac distribution, and discussed the intrinsic carrier concentration and the position of the intrinsic Fermi level.

Fidel Can Kudret, Melike Sena Özkal•October 3, 2026•15 min read
Semiconductor Physics Series Part 5: Semiconductor in Equilibrium

Semiconductor in Equilibrium

1 Introduction:

So far, we have considered a general crystal and attempted to determine certain properties of electrons in a single-crystal lattice by applying the concepts of quantum mechanics to this crystal. In this chapter, we will use the density of quantum states in the conduction band and valence band together with the Fermi–Dirac probability function to determine the electron concentration in the conduction band and the hole concentration in the valence band, respectively. We will also apply the concept of Fermi energy to semiconductor materials.

In this chapter, we consider a semiconductor in equilibrium. Equilibrium, or thermal equilibrium, means that there are no external influences acting on the semiconductor, such as an applied voltage, electric field, magnetic field, or temperature difference. Under these conditions, none of the properties of the semiconductor change with time; that is, they remain constant.

1.1 Charge Carriers in Semiconductors

Current, in the simplest terms, is the flow of charge; that is, when we talk about current, we are referring to moving charges. In a semiconductor, two types of charge carriers can contribute to the current: electrons and holes. We can regard holes as vacancies resulting from the absence of electrons, or directly as positively charged particles. Since the current in a semiconductor is largely determined by the number of electrons in the conduction band and the number of holes in the valence band, an important property of a semiconductor is the concentration of these charge carriers.

The concentrations of electrons and holes are related to two concepts we have discussed previously: the density of states function (DOS function) and the Fermi distribution function. We will first discuss these relationships conceptually; then, we will derive the concentrations of electrons and holes at thermal equilibrium in a more rigorous mathematical manner.

Distribution of Electrons and Holes at Equilibrium

The energy distribution of electrons in the conduction band can be determined by multiplying the density of allowed quantum states by the probability that a given state is occupied by an electron:

n(E)=gc(E),fF(E)(1)n(E) = g_c(E),f_F(E) \tag{1}

Here, n(E)n(E) represents the electron concentration at energy EE, gc(E)g_c(E) represents the density of states function in the conduction band, and fF(E)f_F(E) represents the Fermi–Dirac probability function. If we want to determine the total electron concentration in the conduction band, we integrate Equation (1) over all energies within the conduction band.

Similarly, the energy distribution of holes in the valence band is given by the product of the density of states in the valence band and the probability that a state is not occupied by an electron:

p(E)=gv(E),[1−fF(E)](2)p(E) = g_v(E),[1 - f_F(E)] \tag{2}

Similarly, we can determine the total hole concentration by integrating Equation (2) over the entire valence band.

Here, we would like to make a brief reminder about the density of states (DoS), gc(E)g_c(E) and gv(E)g_v(E). The density of states is an energy-dependent function. Its unit is the number of states per unit volume per unit energy, cm−3eV−1cm^{-3}eV^{-1}. It tells us: "How many allowed quantum states are there per unit volume within a unit energy interval around the energy EE?" In other words, it is a density function normalized with respect to both volume and energy. By itself, it does not give the number of electrons; it only tells us how many available states exist at a given energy.

The concentrations nn and pp (or n(E)n(E) and p(E)p(E)) are, in fact, energy-dependent distribution functions. Their units are also cm−3eV−1cm^{-3}eV^{-1}, since they represent the number of available states multiplied by the probability that those states are occupied by electrons or holes, respectively.

However, when this distribution is integrated over energy (across the entire conduction or valence band), the energy unit cancels out, and the resulting nn or pp represents the actual carrier concentration, with units of cm−3cm^{-3}, i.e., the number of electrons or holes per unit volume. In short, while the density of states is a function distributed with respect to energy, the concentration is the energy-integrated form of this function, reduced to a single quantity.

To determine the electron and hole concentrations at thermal equilibrium, we need to know the position of the Fermi energy EFE_F relative to the lower edge of the conduction band, EcE_c, and the upper edge of the valence band, EvE_v. For this purpose, let us first consider an intrinsic semiconductor. An ideal intrinsic semiconductor is a pure semiconductor that contains no dopant atoms or crystal defects (for example, pure silicon).

At T=0,KT = 0,\text{K}, all states in the valence band of an intrinsic semiconductor are occupied by electrons, while all states in the conduction band are empty. Therefore, the Fermi energy must lie somewhere between EcE_c and EvE_v (the Fermi energy does not necessarily have to correspond to an allowed energy level).

As the temperature begins to rise above 0,K0,\text{K}, electrons in the valence band gain thermal energy. Some electrons may acquire enough energy to transition into the conduction band. When an electron transitions from the valence band to the conduction band, an empty state, or a "hole," is created in the valence band (see Figure (1)). Thus, in an intrinsic semiconductor, electrons and holes are generated in pairs as a result of thermal energy; that is, the number of electrons in the conduction band is equal to the number of holes in the valence band. We will use this equality to derive the equations for the equilibrium charge-carrier concentrations.

1.2 n0p0n_0 p_0 Equations

If the effective masses of electrons and holes are not equal, the Fermi level shifts away from the midgap energy (the energy corresponding to the midpoint of the band gap) in order to maintain equal electron and hole concentrations.

Our primary goal was to determine the equilibrium charge-carrier concentrations. To carry out this derivation, we will need to introduce some new parameter definitions.

1.3 Electron Concentrations in Thermal Equilibrium

As stated previously, we can obtain the equation for the equilibrium concentration of electrons by integrating Equation (1) over all energies in the conduction band:

n0=∫gc(E),fF(E),dE(3)n_0 = \int g_c(E),f_F(E),dE \tag{3}

The lower limit of this integral is EcE_c, while the upper limit should correspond to the highest allowed energy in the conduction band. However, as shown in Figure 2a, since the Fermi probability function rapidly approaches zero as the energy increases, we can take the upper limit of the integral to be infinity.

We assume that the Fermi energy lies within the forbidden energy gap (band gap). For electrons in the conduction band,

E≥EcE \geq E_c

If

Ec−EF≫kT,E_c - E_F \gg kT,

then

E−EF≫kT.E - E_F \gg kT.

Under these conditions, the Fermi probability function can be reduced to the Boltzmann approximation. Accordingly,

fF(E)=11+exp⁡(E−EFkT)f_F(E) = \frac{1}{1 + \exp\left(\frac{E - E_F}{kT}\right)}

can be written as

fF(E)≈exp⁡(−E−EFkT).(4)f_F(E) \approx \exp\left(-\frac{E - E_F}{kT}\right). \tag{4}

The essential idea here is that when E−EFE - E_F is much greater than kTkT, the 1 in the denominator of the Fermi–Dirac distribution can be neglected, and the function takes the form of the classical Boltzmann distribution.

Applying the Boltzmann approximation to Equation (3), the equilibrium electron concentration in the conduction band can be obtained from

n0=∫Ec∞4π(2mn∗)3/2h3,(E−Ec)1/2exp⁡(−E−EFkT)dE.(5)n_0 = \int_{E_c}^{\infty} \frac{4\pi(2m_n^*)^{3/2}}{h^3},(E - E_c)^{1/2} \exp\left(-\frac{E - E_F}{kT}\right) dE. \tag{5}

The integral in Equation (5) can be solved more easily by making a change of variables. Let

ϵ=E−EckT.\epsilon = \frac{E - E_c}{kT}.

Then, Equation (5) becomes

n0=4π(2mn∗kT)3/2h3exp⁡(−Ec−EFkT)∫0∞ϵ1/2e−ϵ,dϵ.(6)n_0 = \frac{4\pi(2m_n^* kT)^{3/2}}{h^3} \exp\left(-\frac{E_c - E_F}{kT}\right) \int_0^{\infty} \epsilon^{1/2} e^{-\epsilon}, d\epsilon. \tag{6}

This integral is a Gamma function, whose value is

∫0∞η1/2e−η,dη=π2.(7)\int_0^{\infty} \eta^{1/2} e^{-\eta}, d\eta = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}. \tag{7}

Thus, Equation (6) can be written as

n0=2(2πmn∗kTh2)3/2exp⁡(−Ec−EFkT).(8)n_0 = 2\left(\frac{2\pi m_n^* kT}{h^2}\right)^{3/2} \exp\left(-\frac{E_c - E_F}{kT}\right). \tag{8}

We can now define a parameter NcN_c:

Nc=2(2πmn∗kTh2)3/2.(9)N_c = 2\left(\frac{2\pi m_n^* kT}{h^2}\right)^{3/2}. \tag{9}

Here, mn∗m_n^* is the density-of-states effective mass of the electron. Thus, the equilibrium electron concentration in the conduction band can be expressed as

n0=Ncexp⁡(−Ec−EFkT).(10)n_0 = N_c \exp\left(-\frac{E_c - E_F}{kT}\right). \tag{10}

The parameter NcN_c is called the effective density of states in the conduction band. If

mn∗=m0,m_n^* = m_0,

then, at T=300,KT = 300,\text{K}, the effective density of states is approximately

Nc=2.5×1019 cm−3.N_c = 2.5 \times 10^{19}\ \text{cm}^{-3}.

This value is of the same order of magnitude as NcN_c for most semiconductors.

When the effective mass of the electron is larger or smaller than m0m_0, the value of the effective density of states changes accordingly. Nevertheless, it remains of approximately the same order of magnitude. The most important result here is that as EFE_F approaches EcE_c, the electron concentration in the conduction band increases exponentially.

1.4 Hole Concentrations in Thermal Equilibrium

Similarly, we can obtain the equation for the equilibrium hole concentration by integrating Equation (2) over all energies in the valence band:

p0=∫gv(E),[1−fF(E)],dE.(11)p_0 = \int g_v(E),[1 - f_F(E)],dE. \tag{11}

The expression in square brackets can be written for states in the valence band (E<EvE < E_v) as

1−fF(E)=11+exp⁡(EF−EkT).1 - f_F(E) = \frac{1}{1 + \exp\left(\frac{E_F - E}{kT}\right)}.

If

EF−Ev≫kT,E_F - E_v \gg kT,

then

EF−E≫kT.E_F - E \gg kT.

Under these conditions, the Fermi probability function reduces to a slightly different form of the Boltzmann approximation:

1−fF(E)≈exp⁡(−EF−EkT).(12)1 - f_F(E) \approx \exp\left(-\frac{E_F - E}{kT}\right). \tag{12}

Applying this approximation to Equation (11), the equilibrium hole concentration in the valence band can be written as

p0=∫−∞Ev4π(2mp∗)3/2h3,Ev−E,exp⁡(−EF−EkT)dE.(13)p_0 = \int_{-\infty}^{E_v} \frac{4\pi(2m_p^*)^{3/2}}{h^3},\sqrt{E_v - E}, \exp\left(-\frac{E_F - E}{kT}\right) dE. \tag{13}

As shown in Figure 2(a), the Fermi probability function for holes approaches zero as the energy decreases. Therefore, taking the lower limit of the integral in Equation (13) to be negative infinity does not affect the validity of the equation.

The integral in Equation (13) can likewise be simplified by making a change of variables. Let

η′=Ev−EkT.\eta' = \frac{E_v - E}{kT}.

Then, Equation (13) becomes

p0=−4π(2mp∗kT)3/2h3exp⁡(−EF−EvkT)∫+∞0(η′)1/2exp⁡(−η′),dη′.(14)p_0 = \frac{-4\pi(2m_p^* kT)^{3/2}}{h^3} \exp\left(-\frac{E_F - E_v}{kT}\right) \int_{+\infty}^{0} (\eta')^{1/2} \exp(-\eta'), d\eta'. \tag{14}

Note that the differential dEdE is negative under this change of variables. Therefore, the order of the integration limits must be reversed. Using the Gamma function again, p0p_0 can be written as

p0=2(2πmp∗kTh2)3/2exp⁡(−EF−EvkT).(15)p_0 = 2\left(\frac{2\pi m_p^* kT}{h^2}\right)^{3/2} \exp\left(-\frac{E_F - E_v}{kT}\right). \tag{15}

Here, mp∗m_p^* is the density-of-states effective mass of the hole. We can define the parameter NvN_v, representing the effective density of states in the valence band, as

Nv=2(2πmp∗kTh2)3/2.(16)N_v = 2\left(\frac{2\pi m_p^* kT}{h^2}\right)^{3/2}. \tag{16}

Thus, the equilibrium hole concentration in the valence band can be expressed as

p0=Nvexp⁡(−EF−EvkT).(17)p_0 = N_v \exp\left(-\frac{E_F - E_v}{kT}\right). \tag{17}

For most semiconductors at T=300,KT = 300,\text{K}, NvN_v is also of the order of 1019,cm−310^{19},\text{cm}^{-3}.

The effective density-of-states parameters NcN_c and NvN_v have fixed values for a given semiconductor material at a fixed temperature. Tables containing these values for different temperatures are commonly used.

1.5 Intrinsic Carrier Concentration

As mentioned previously, intrinsic semiconductors are pure semiconductors that contain no dopant atoms or crystal defects. Because of this property, the electron concentration in the conduction band is equal to the hole concentration in the valence band in an intrinsic semiconductor. Thus, the equality of the charge-carrier concentrations in an intrinsic semiconductor can be expressed as

ni=pi.(18)n_i = p_i. \tag{18}

For simplicity, we will refer to nin_i as the intrinsic carrier concentration and use the notation nin_i instead of pip_i as well.

For intrinsic semiconductors, the Fermi energy level is denoted by EF=EFiE_F = E_{Fi}. Using Equations (10) and (17), we can write

n0=ni=Ncexp⁡(−Ec−EFikT)(19)n_0 = n_i = N_c \exp\left(-\frac{E_c - E_{Fi}}{kT}\right) \tag{19}

and

p0=pi=ni=Nvexp⁡(−EFi−EvkT).(20)p_0 = p_i = n_i = N_v \exp\left(-\frac{E_{Fi} - E_v}{kT}\right). \tag{20}

Multiplying Equations (19) and (20), we obtain

ni2=NcNvexp⁡(−Ec−EvkT)=NcNvexp⁡(−EgkT).(21)n_i^2 = N_c N_v \exp\left(-\frac{E_c - E_v}{kT}\right) = N_c N_v \exp\left(-\frac{E_g}{kT}\right). \tag{21}

Here, EgE_g is the band-gap energy. The most important conclusion that can be drawn from Equation (21) is that, for a given semiconductor at a fixed temperature, the intrinsic carrier concentration nin_i is a constant independent of the Fermi energy. In addition, the equation shows that the carrier concentration is highly dependent on temperature. This temperature dependence is shown for Ge, Si, and GaAs in Figure 3.

1.6 The Intrinsic Fermi-Level Position

The position of the Fermi level is closely related to the effective masses of the charge carriers. Let us now examine this relationship for intrinsic semiconductors.

We have seen that, in an intrinsic semiconductor, the electron concentration must be equal to the hole concentration. Therefore, we can set Equations (19) and (20) equal to each other:

Ncexp⁡(−Ec−EFikT)=Nvexp⁡(−EFi−EvkT).(22)N_c \exp\left(-\frac{E_c - E_{Fi}}{kT}\right) = N_v \exp\left(-\frac{E_{Fi} - E_v}{kT}\right). \tag{22}

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides of Equation (22) and solving for EFiE_{Fi}, we obtain

EFi=12(Ec+Ev)+12kTln⁡(NvNc).(23)E_{Fi} = \frac{1}{2}(E_c + E_v) + \frac{1}{2}kT \ln\left(\frac{N_v}{N_c}\right). \tag{23}

Finally, we can use the expressions for NcN_c and NvN_v defined in Equations (9) and (16), respectively. We can also rewrite the midgap energy, by definition, as

12(Ec+Ev)=Emidgap.\frac{1}{2}(E_c + E_v) = E_{midgap}.

Thus,

EFi=Emidgap+34kTln⁡(mp∗mn∗),(24)E_{Fi} = E_{midgap} + \frac{3}{4}kT \ln\left(\frac{m_p^*}{m_n^*}\right), \tag{24}

or equivalently,

EFi−Emidgap=34kTln⁡(mp∗mn∗).(25)E_{Fi} - E_{midgap} = \frac{3}{4}kT \ln\left(\frac{m_p^*}{m_n^*}\right). \tag{25}

The main conclusions we should draw from Equation (24) are:

  • The Fermi level shifts above the center of the band gap when mp∗>mn∗m_p^* > m_n^*, and below the center when mp∗<mn∗m_p^* < m_n^*. In other words, the Fermi level shifts away from the band with the higher density of states in order to maintain the balance between the available states. This occurs because the number of electrons and holes must remain equal in an intrinsic semiconductor.
  • When the effective masses of the charge carriers are equal, the Fermi level lies exactly at the center of the band gap.

In this article, we have learned how to determine the charge-carrier concentrations of intrinsic semiconductors at equilibrium. We have also examined the relationship between the Fermi energy level and the effective-mass parameter. In the next article, we will deepen our understanding by considering extrinsic semiconductors, which are widely used in semiconductor technology.

References

F

Fidel Can Kudret

Author

M

Melike Sena Özkal

Author